la camera di valentina

Free The Nipple ante litteram – ENG

Welcome back to “the erotic art word”, where you choose these articles’ fates. These art history’s small bites taste like female nipples. #Freethenipple ante litteram.

la camera di valentina
Helena Fourment or “The Fur”, 1636/8, Peter Paul Rubens

Helena Fourment or “The Fur”, 1636/8, Peter Paul Rubens

“I liked the idea of marrying a woman who doesn’t blush whenever she sees me holding a brush.” [1] 

Helena Fourment was Paul Ruben’s second, very young wife. Here, she seems portrayed in a disrupted moment – maybe, we would say – before or afterwards a good bath. She looks straight at the painter with a present complicity glance. The ambience tends to be so shadowy Caravaggesque that charmed Rubens and peers; a darkness that seems to wrap around the fur, hugging Helena, whose glimmer deeply contrasts with her very white skin.

I couldn’t say what could be more erotic in that gesture: either to make a run for it and cover with the fur, striking the pose of Venus Pudica (prudish), or her eyes, instead, that hesitate, without a single hint of rush.

Either way, it’s all about this gesture, this is where all the magic happens: the arm, reaching out the flap of fur coat to cover herself, pinches her breasts, making her ample bosom look more prosperous; it looks like two apples harvested between her arms.

la camera di valentina
Cupid and Psyche, 1817, Jacques Louis-David

Cupid and Psyche, 1817, Jacques Louis-David

You know David, the one of “The Death of Marat”? The symbolical, politicially engaged, neo-classical David? Here it is, David. Every now and then he’s frivolous, too. His painting, as you may see, provides the representation of the conflict between idealized love and physical reality, which might have a quite consistent coherence with the myth of Cupid and Psyche itself [2]; you may forgive me, though, but that strikingly chilled post-orgasmic slacking doesn’t see to me any kind of conflict. Cupid, which is depresented as a spoiled, dangerous naughty boy (ah, romance…!), he shows a smug face like he just had quite a lot of fun. Psyche, on her part, is already sleeping as she’s supposed to be, beign already daylight, but I would say her cheeks confirm for herself the same blast he had.

Well known were his architectonical compositions (he treated bodies as monuments); here, he went with the flow: he always leaves an intrinsick geometrical structure, sliding the core of the two subjects. That means that our eyes wander like the butterfly upon Psyche, her soul. But when we dwell on these two lovers, the eroticism strucks us completely. And it’s there, in Cupid’s unseemly posture, that we notice his arm isolating and framing Psyche’s breasts, with her nipple as red as her cheeks. And this flushing confirms they were in for a revel last night.

la camera di valentina
The pink shirt, 1927, Tamara De Lempicka

The pink shirt, 1927, Tamara De Lempicka

Folks, we’re now talking about De Lempicka, her fame speaks for herself and says it all: this unconventional artist, a pioneer for her age; every solid brush stroke of hers marvellously arises and dies in eroticism.

Here we introduce you a lying woman, her whole body weighs on her left arm, gently rested on a pillow; her head slightly tilted, her eyes are pointing straight up, it seems she’s looking at someone. Her strong neck and shoulders and her ’30s makeup are all remarkable details in De Lempicka’s style.

We can tell we are in the XX century and we’re loosen the prudishness grip because there’s so much less mystery, we could already tell what will catch our attention by just looking at the painting’s name: the pink shirt, which just fell off from one of the shoulders (it was propably taken off on purpose), two prefectly rounded breasts are reveiled just under the transparent silk, with two nipples even more red than her lips. They are so voluminous and hard, they don’t even follow the shadow’s geometry: they shine with their very own light, piercing the canvas. But why oh why do I keep writing, as I’m quite sure it’s been a while since you stopped reading.

la camera di valentina
Sex Painting #1, 2009, Betty Tompkins

Sex Painting #1, 2009, Betty Tompkins

Yeah, I know, I sneak up on you a little. Betty Tompkins is the artist LCDV really needed: belonging to the fierce ’70s feminist wave (where female artists claimed their places inside the art system), sex positive, Tompkins stole the heterosexual porn imagery to question women’s role in the society and in sex, by using very specific creative process and techniques. What you see is not a blurred and noisy picture: it’s an acrylic on canvas. Betty Tampkins would take mainstream porn images, maybe from magazines, too, crop them, isolate the details, study them, zoom ‘em out and eventually reproduce them on canvas. The realism of these images gets you the idea of how talented this artist truly is.

These close-ups we’re quite familiar with – from porn –, reproduced with this technique, make the detail almost surreal, out of context, allowing to elaborat the ideas of women and women’s bodies in a totally unexpected and innovative way: a subject of pleasure. These nasty courbet-ish true tits, vulvas and lips zooms show the body as it is: there’s no lies. In this 24×24 square, those who may appear to be two bodies, form an armonious, poetical, intimate geometry, made of simple, minimal shapes, and yet so familar: the fingers straight lines, the brests curve, the wrinkles we find in the torso, and that nipple, that dark climax among those few shadows (the exact opposite of De Lempicka’s squalling painting). They simply are facts, reality, two bodies while they’re having sex.

It used to be a porn, now it’s an open window that leads to potential… po-rn-ssibilities.

I’ll see you to the next erotic art word to find out together which odd paths we could possibly take, among nice filthy things and other stuff.

translation by: Francesca Paola Plicato
(click here to read other translations)


notes:
[1] Rubens in a letter to his friend Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc
[2] Cupid and Psyche myth, featured in Apuleo’s “Metamorphosis”: Psyche was a beautiful lady; Aphrodite, Cupid’s mother, was jealous of her and asked his son to shoot an arrow so that Psyche could fall in love with the ugliest man on earth. But Cupid messed up by shooting himself instead, so he tremendously fell in love for Psyche instead. To escape Aphtodite’s wrath, Cupid and Psyche met secretly, only by night, so that Psyche couldn’t see his lover’s face (to avoid revealing the God of Love’s identity). But pushed from her sisters, one night, Psyche decided to reveal her lover’s face: she brought an oil lamp with her and, once the god showed up, she pointed the lamp right at him, uncovering the mystery. As fate would have it, a drop of oil touched Cupid’s skin and burnt him; spooked, he ran away. Please, sassy Psyche, let him just fuck you!!!
sources:
getdailyart.com
delempicka.org
clevelandart.com
bettytompkins.com
www.khm.at

Rispondi

Inserisci i tuoi dati qui sotto o clicca su un'icona per effettuare l'accesso:

Logo di WordPress.com

Stai commentando usando il tuo account WordPress.com. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Google photo

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Google. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Foto Twitter

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Twitter. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Foto di Facebook

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Facebook. Chiudi sessione /  Modifica )

Connessione a %s...